Sandplay Therapists of America

Search | Site Map | Contact Us

Sandplay Therapists of America

Clinical Member (CST/CST-T) Training Guidelines

Home
About Sandplay
About STA/Join
STA Associates
Sandplay News
Contact STA Therapists
FAQs
Forum
Journal
Training & Conferences
Research
Books About Sandplay
Symbol Literature
Products & Classified
Links
   Home > About STA/Join > Clinical Member (CST/CST-T) Training Guidelines

Join Online ] [ Clinical Member (CST/CST-T) Training Guidelines ] Sandplay Practitioner (SP) Guidelines (pdf) ]

HANDBOOK of Clinical and Teaching Member Requirements and Procedures Sandplay Therapists of America (ISST)

I-V Requirements and Procedures
Appendix - Forms
Ancillary Information - Curriculum Guide, etc.

Effective January 1, 2004 - Revised April 17, 2005

  A printable version of the STA Handbook (reproduced below) is also available in PDF. If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat Reader on your computer simply click here to download the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.
 

REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

I. PRE-QUALIFICATIONS FOR CLINICAL MEMBERSHIP
II. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR CLINICAL MEMBERSHIP
III. BECOME A CANDIDATE FOR CLINICAL MEMBERSHIP
IV. BECOME A CLINICAL MEMBER
V. BECOME A TEACHING MEMBER


APPENDIX – FORMS (pdf)

ANCILLARY INFORMATION


I. PRE-QUALIFICATIONS FOR CLINICAL MEMBERSHIP

1. POST-GRADUATE DEGREE

Requirement: Graduate degree in a helping profession such as medicine, psychology, clinical social work, pastoral counseling, school counseling, or marriage and family counseling, from a regionally accredited university.

Time Frame: Two years prior to application.

To Document: Submit copy of degree.

2. CLINICAL KNOWLEDGE BASE

Requirement: Knowledge of psychotherapy, psycho-diagnosis, and psychology obtained through formal study and two years of supervised clinical experience.

Time Frame: Prior to application.

To Document: On the application, indicate the courses taken that meet this requirement and submit copies of official transcripts with the application.

3. LICENSURE

Requirement: Licensure to practice psychotherapy.

Time Frame: Prior to application.

To Document: Submit a photocopy of license or credential with application. Also submit evidence of having completed 2000 hours of direct supervised clinical or counseling experience. If licensure is not required in your state, submit information substantiating this with your application.

4. PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT

Requirement: In-depth inner development and insight as gained through analysis and/or psychotherapy. The combined total number of hours of analysis, psychotherapy and personal sandplay process (see next section) is a minimum of 100 hours.

Time Frame: Analysis and/or psychotherapy should have occurred within the past 10 years prior to the date of application. Analysis and/or psychotherapy may be concurrent with personal sandplay process.

To Document: With application submit a description of the therapist’s therapeutic orientation, dates of analysis and/or psychotherapy, and total number of hours.

II. TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR CLINICAL MEMBERSHIP

1. POST-GRADUATE DEGREE

Requirement: Graduate degree in a helping profession such as medicine, psychology, clinical social work, pastoral counseling, school counseling, or marriage and family counseling, from a regionally accredited university.

Time Frame: Two years prior to application.

To Document: Submit copy of degree.

2. PERSONAL SANDPLAY PROCESS

Requirement: An honest, transformative personal sandplay process is the most significant, foundational requirement of the training sequence. The process must occur with an ISST member after that individual has achieved clinical membership. A minimum of 40 sessions (not sand trays) are required for the completion of the personal sandplay process. Although no required number of sand trays is designated, it is generally felt that creation of a minimum of 30 sand trays is necessary to experience an in-depth sandplay process.

Time Frame: The personal sandplay process must have been experienced within the last 10 years prior to the date of application. Although it may overlap the completion of other training requirements, it is generally accepted that the best way to experience the sandplay process is prior to pursuing formal study of sandplay theory and practice.

To Document: Submit the form letter from your ISST therapist attesting to the dates of therapy and the completion of the minimum requirements. (Appendix Form 3)

Rationale: Dora Kalff states, “The emphasis of the sandplay process is on the fullness or wholeness of the process.” As we are often asked for guidance and clarification, it seems helpful to provide our minimum expectations.

2. STUDY OF SANDPLAY THEORY AND PRACTICE

Requirement: A comprehensive program of study including the following general conditions are required. The minimum total number of coursework hours is 120. The minimum hours of coursework in each content area are designated as follows:

  1. Introduction to Sandplay Therapy (18 hrs. minimum)
  2. Clinical Sandplay Practice (48 hrs. minimum)
  3. Jungian Theory (18 hrs. minimum)
  4. Symbolism (18 hrs. minimum)
  5. Electives (no minimum)

Please refer to the Sandplay Training Curriculum Guide (Appendix Page A14/1-1) for a more detailed listing of content areas and suggested themes for study.

Time Frame: Introductory content may be studied prior to, or concurrently with, or after, experiencing the personal sandplay process. It is recommended that further study and clinical sandplay practice be delayed until after the personal sandplay process has been completed or is at least meaningfully underway.

To Document: The applicant is responsible for maintaining a record of lectures, workshops, seminars, and conferences attended. The application requires submission of a list of training events attended including dates, location, presenter, and number of training hours awarded. Refer to the section below Application to Become a Candidate, a).

3. CONSULTATION

Requirements: Applicants are encouraged to seek consultation from someone other than the therapist with whom they completed their sandplay process. In situations where no other ISST member is available, consultation with the process therapist should occur no sooner than six months after the sandplay process has been completed. (Refer to Appendix: Consultation – Additional Information, page A15/1-1)

  1. A minimum of 75 hours of sandplay case consultation with an ISST member is required.
  2. At least 25 of these hours must be individual case consultation with an ISST Teaching Member, after that individual has achieved Teaching Membership.
  3. The remaining hours may be obtained in the presentation of cases in group consultation with up to six participants, facilitated by an ISST Clinical or Teaching Member. (Only hours in which an applicant presents a case may be counted towards fulfilling this requirement.) The hours may be counted towards the 48 clinical sandplay practice hours when an applicant is not presenting.

Time Frame: It is recommended that consultation be delayed until after the applicant’s personal sandplay process is complete or at least meaningfully underway.

To Document: A letter from the applicant’s primary consultant verifying the applicant’s total number of consultation hours accrued with all consultants must be submitted with the application. (Appendix Form 4)

Rationale: The purpose of consultation is to facilitate the exploration and enhancement of one’s own work. To count hours in which other’s work is presented would not fulfill the purpose of this requirement.

4. PRELIMINARY PAPERS

Requirements: Submission and approval of two preliminary papers is required. Each paper must be approximately 10 double-spaced pages in length. One paper should be an in-depth exploration of a symbol, archetypal image, or theme. The second paper may be an exploration of another symbol or it may address any theoretical aspect of sandplay of interest to the applicant. Each paper should include the relevance of the topic to clinical sandplay practice. Each paper must be read and approved by an ISST Clinical or Teaching Member who has been a clinical member for at least two years and is not the personal process therapist or advisor. (Appendix Form 5 and Appendix: Preliminary Paper and Reader – Additional Information, page A16/1-3.)

Time Frame: Preliminary papers should be written after the applicant has completed a significant portion of his/her personal sandplay process, completed a significant portion of course study, and established a clinical sandplay practice. At least one paper must be read and approved prior to application for admission as a training candidate. (Refer to Appendix: Preliminary Papers – Additional Information and Preliminary Paper Criteria, page A16/1-3)

5. CHOOSING AN ADVISOR

Requirement: To become a candidate for membership, an applicant must choose an STA member as an advisor. The advisor must have held clinical membership in ISST for at least one year prior to selection as an advisor, and has not served as the applicant’s therapist. (Appendix Form 6.)

Time Frame: An advisor may be chosen at any point prior to formal application for membership candidacy. (Refer to Appendix: Advisor – Additional Information, Page A17/1-4)

To Document: Designate on application form.

Fee:

III. BECOME A CANDIDATE FOR CLINICAL MEMBERSHIP

1. APPLICATION

Requirements: To become a candidate for Clinical Membership, an applicant must submit a formal application to the STA Admissions Committee with application fee. The application is essentially a portfolio that must include the following:

  1. Completed application form. (Appendix Form 1)
  2. Two-three page autobiographical statement.
  3. Documentation of post-graduate degree.
  4. Official post-graduate course transcripts.
  5. Copy of License and/or your state’s statutes verifying that licensure is not required. If there is no licensure, there should be documentation of 1) 2000 hours of supervised clinical experience or 2) two years of supervised clinical experience. (Appendix Form 2)
  6. Copy of Resume or Vitae.
  7. Documentation of previous analysis and/or psychotherapy including dates and total number of hours.
  8. A letter from your ISST therapist verifying completion of, or engagement in, ongoing sandplay process. (Appendix Form 3)
  9. Documentation of a minimum of 120 hours of coursework. These 120 hours must include the full minimum of 18 hours of introductory course content.
  10. A list of books and articles read relevant to sandplay training.
  11. Documentation of at least 40 of the required 75 hours of consultation. (Appendix Form 4)
  12. Copies of at least one of the required preliminary papers, along with a letter of approval from the reader.

2. ADMISSIONS INTERVIEW

Requirement: Once submitted, the application will be reviewed by the Membership Chair. The applicant will then be scheduled for an interview with the STA Admissions Committee who will make a recommendation to the Membership Chair regarding the readiness of the applicant to become a candidate.

Time Frame: Interviews are generally scheduled in conjunction with STA conferences, Intensives, Membership meetings, and Board meetings. Once an applicant is admitted as a candidate for membership, his/her membership application will continue to be processed in accordance with the STA policies and procedures in effect as of the date of admission as a candidate for membership. Recommendations of the Admissions Committee should be completed at this time.

Clarification of Handbook Re Admissions Committee: The Admissions Committee consists of three, or in limited circumstances two Clinical Members who do not have another relationship with the client such as therapist, consultant or advisor. The applicant's symbol paper is provided to committee members prior to the interview. The purpose of the interview is to give the applicant the opportunity to talk with STA clinical members and for the committee to express any recommendations it may have for the applicant. The Admissions Committee makes no recommendation regarding the applicant's acceptance as a candidate for clinical membership.

IV. BECOME A CLINICAL MEMBER

1. SPECIFICATIONS

Requirements: To become a Clinical Member the candidate should:

  1. Complete the remaining educational and consultation hours.
  2. Complete and have two preliminary papers approved.
  3. Complete and submit the final case study to three readers, two national and one international. With the help of his or her advisor, the candidate should contact two of the principal national readers and one international reader. A reader may not have been the applicant’s therapist or consultant, or have hand a personal relationship with the candidate. Once two national and one international reader are selected, the candidate sends a copy of the case to each with response forms, (Appendix Form 7, 8 and 9), and includes self-addressed (postage paid in national cases) for the return of forms to his or her advisor and return of the case copies to the candidate. (Refer to Appendix: Case Report Process and Advisor Information - Advisor’s Role in the Case Report.)
  4. Be approved for clinical membership by the readers of the case study.
    Time Frame: There is no time limit for completion of the final requirements for Clinical Membership.

To Document: Documentation of the remaining requirements should be forwarded to the Membership Chair upon completion. (Appendix Form 10)

V. BECOME A TEACHING MEMBER

1. ATTEND SANDPLAY CONFERENCE(S)

Requirement: A Clinical Member should attend at least one international ISST conference or one STA national conference before submitting an application for teaching membership (Appendix Form 11).

Rationale: Attendance at international and national conference(s) encourages a broader and deeper perspective. The vision of our founder, Dora Kalff, is that Sandplay is an international modality.

Time Frame: A Clinical Member may fulfill this requirement at any point in his/her training.

To Document: Forward a letter or certificate verifying attendance to the Membership Chair.

2. SELECT A TEACHING CONSULTANT

Requirement: A Clinical Member should select a Teaching Member to act as a consultant/mentor/guide to help work with the Clinical Member to:

  1. Become familiar with the Sandplay curriculum.
  2. Prepare at least three cases for presentation in addition to the case that is the subject of the final case report.
  3. Present at least one case at a regional, national or international conference.
  4. Develop skills in consulting and reading of preliminary papers.
  5. Teach at least one introductory class on sandplay for a minimum of three hours.

Rationale: Teaching and training of sandplay therapists is the major goal of Sandplay Therapists of America. Excellence in teaching is a hallmark of this organization.

Time Frame: There is no deadline for the completion of these requirements. Individuals are encouraged to work towards meeting these requirements at a pace that is comfortable for them. (Candidates for Membership may select a Teaching Consultant and work on meeting these requirements at any point after being accepted as a candidate for membership.)

To Document: Regarding the case presentation and Introductory Course teaching requirements, written evaluation forms from the participants (Appendix Form 12) are required and must be reviewed by the Teaching Consultant who is responsible for making a final decision that the requirements are successfully met. Once all case preparation and teaching requirements are met, the Teaching Consultant writes a letter of recommendation for admission as a Teaching Member addressed to the STA Board and sent to the Membership Chair, (Appendix Form 13).


APPENDIX - FORMS


ANCILLARY INFORMATION

SANDPLAY TRAINING CURRICULUM GUIDE

Introduction to Sandplay Therapy Includes, but is not limited to:

  1. History and origins of sandplay.
  2. Kalffian theory: meaning of the free and protected space, the role of the therapist, the healing nature of the sand itself.
  3. Basic Jungian framework: theory of archetypes, living reality of the psyche, wounded healer, and transcendent function.
  4. Practical considerations: creating and maintaining the collection, record keeping, photography, tray specifications, sand and water.
  5. Introduction of sandplay to clients.
  6. Initial trays.
  7. Importance of symbols and the symbolic language of the unconscious.
  8. Introduction to exploration of symbols.
  9. Stages and themes of the sandplay process.
  10. Differentiation of Kalffian sandplay from other uses of the sandplay and figures.

Clinical Sandplay Includes, but is not limited to:

  1. In-depth sandplay case study.
  2. Co-transference.
  3. Work with children and parents.
  4. Work with adults.
  5. Termination.
  6. Understanding sandtrays.
  7. Review of trays with client.
  8. Expanded discussion of sandplay process including transcendent function, relativization of the ego, constellation of the opposites, manifestation of the Self.
  9. The appearance of the body and psychosomatic themes.
  10. Precautions, defenses and resistances.

Symbolism Includes, but is not limited to:

  1. Religion.
  2. Fairy tales.
  3. Myths.
  4. Cultural traditions.

Consultation – Additional Information

  • Group Consultation: The accrued hours should be with a minimum of
    two different teaching members.
  • Individual Consultation: ISST prefers face-to-face consultation as much as
    possible. If there are geographical challenges, then up to 50 of the 75
    individual consultation hours can be obtained by phone or online.
  • Consultation supervision for clinical membership in ISST is not the same as clinical supervision required for graduate degrees.

Preliminary Paper – Additional Information

Preliminary papers will be read using the following criteria:
  1. Personal Relationship to Symbol/Subject
    The writer discusses his/her personal connection to the symbol/subject,
    including why he/she selected this symbol/subject plus how it is
    meaningful to the writer and how it has impacted the writer’s personal
    and/or professional life. The writer communicates a strong interest in the
    symbol/subject.
  2. Amplification of Symbol/Subject
    The writer amplifies the symbol/subject through discussion of theory,
    mythology, fairy tales, art, dreams, religion, and/or views from various
    cultures/collectives, including the writer’s own culture. In a thoughtful,
    insightful, and competent manner, the writer surveys literature regarding
    the symbol/subject. The amplification catches the interest and imagination
    of the reader, and indicates a deepening of understanding. The writer adds
    value to the discussion through providing his/her own reflections, including
    the transformative nature of the symbol/subject.
  3. Impact of Symbol/Subject in Sandplay
    The writer discusses the impact of the symbol/subject in sandplay, using
    hypothetical and/or actual sandplay scenes from his/her own experience.
    When discussing a symbol, the writer uses one to three photographs of
    sandplay scenes to competently describe how the symbol enhanced the
    therapeutic process of the sandplayer. When discussing a subject, the
    writer discusses how this information enhanced his/her knowledge about
    sandplay and how this knowledge might impact the sandplay process. The
    writer also indicates what types of investigation need to be done to further
    the understanding of the symbol/subject.
  4. Mechanics of Symbol/Subject Paper
    The writer submits a paper that meets professional standards. The paper is well written with a logical structure, e.g., contains an introduction, middle and conclusion. Care is given to writing mechanics, e.g., correct spelling, sentence structure, and grammar. The format of the paper and references follow APA standards.

The applicant contacts a preliminary paper reader from the list in the appendix. The applicant may not have a dual relationship with the prospective preliminary paper reader. If the reader agrees to read the paper, the applicant mails the paper, along with Appendix Form 5. The reader reads the paper and completes the assessment. All four areas of criteria must be rated as indicated on Form 5. Strengths and/or improvements may be indicated in each area. If approved, the reader writes “Approved” and dates the front page of the first paper, and along with Form 5, mails copies to the applicant, advisor and STA office. The reader is asked to return the paper to the applicant.

If the paper has been evaluated to be insufficient, the reader is asked to suggest
corrective action for the applicant to take. The applicant can respond to the
suggestions or find another reader. If the second reader also evaluates the paper as insufficient, a discussion will take place with the two readers and the advisor and recommendations will be made to the applicant. If the applicant is dissatisfied with the final recommendations, an appeal can be made to the Exceptions Committee.

Preliminary Paper Readers

Requirements to be a Preliminary Paper Reader:

  1. Must have been a clinical member for at least two years.
  2. Can be either a clinical or teaching member.
  3. Must be a member in good standing.
  4. Must not have a dual role with the applicant.
First Name Last Name Phone Email
Frank Adair 650/368-2573 fadair@pacbell.net
Kate Adams 215/348-8454 keadams@comcast.net
Kate Amatruda 415/899-0013 info@psychceu.com
Barbara Bagan 480/367-1476 rxart1@aol.com
Linda   Bath 530/681-8401 le_bath@yahoo.com
Agnes  Bayley 401/635-2012 -
Kathleen    Beavers 916/984-8769 kabeavers@earthlink.net
Lee Ben-Yehuda 619/501-8843 LeesMail@aol.com
Wendy Beneke 337/988-0184 wbeneke@aol.com
LaVon Bobo 408/549-5308 -
Kay Bradway 415/332-3367 katherinebradway1@msn.com
Priscilla Braun 952/870-4264 cilbraun@aol.com
Nancy Burnett 303/753-1002 nancyburnettphd@qwest.net
Joyce Camuyrano Cunningham 415/668-8250 JoyceCunninghamJournalofSandplayTherapy@att.net
Tessamarie    Capitolo 415/456-4448 tssamarie@aol.com
Lucia  Chambers 408/244-7942x3# luciaac@aol.com
Maria Ellen    Chiaia 510/654-3281 mchiaia@aol.com
Lauren Cunningham 415/585-4551 lauren_c@pacbell.net
Linda Dean 707/443-4105 lindadean1@cox.net
Lucretia Devine 206/818-8445 lucretiamd@att.net
Regina Driscoll 651/220-6900 regina.driscoll@childrensmn.org
Patricia Dunn Fierstein 813/253-3797 patricia.df@verizon.net
Pratibha Eastwood 808/595-HOPE pratibhaeastwood@iname.com
Christine Ford 303/832-9767 sandford@ecentral.com
Grace Foster Pollard 303/554-8838 gafpollard@aol.com
Harriet Friedman 310/277-9503 shrinks2@sbcglobal.net
Susan Gillotti 508/696-6072 gillotti.mvy@verizon.net
Lois Gradwell 925/943-1274 legradwell@aol.com
Mariellen Griffith 309/454-2111 mariellengriffith@verizon.net
Florence Grossenbacher 510/891-8125 -
Olivia Heathcote 408/920-2990 droliviadh@aol.com
Gretchen Hegeman 206/781-7736 gretchenhegeman@hotmail.com
Rosalind Heiko 919/517-2697 sandplayer@mindspring.com
Grace Hong +886 2 2367-9595
#629
hong2298@ms43.hinet.net
Linda Hunter 561/582-9284 Ray4s@aol.com
Diane Hyde 503/227-6080 dianehyde@qwest.net
Betty Jackson 717/529-2768 bettyjlcsw@aol.com
Donna Johnson 404/812-0628 dj4art@earthlink.net
Holly Johnson - HEHJNYC@aol.com
Jacquelyn Kelley 469/667-9413 Jkelley200@aol.com
Liana Kornfield 415/488-9780 lkornfield@aol.com
Chonita Larsen - jckcho@aol.com
Susan Macnofsky 505/867-1430 suesky@aol.com
Elizabeth Margoliash 707/542-4549 -
Zoe McClellan 707/664-9611 -
Bonnie McLean 503/221-7220 bmcl10000@qwest.net
Lynne McManus 925/933-4072 lynne3542@ca.astound.net
Joseph Meyer 715/268-4743 joemeyer@amerytel.net
Flavia Millikan 707/939-3877 flaviamillikan@earthlink.net
Betty Milstead 512/345-0249 bmilstead@austin.rr.com
Randa Miranda Diamond 510/843-7106 andarmi@earthlink.net
Barbara Miriello 619/584-1725 -
Rie Rogers Mitchell 818/677-4976 rie.mitchell@csun.edu
Gita Morena 619/328-9020 gitam@aol.com
Barbara B. Nelson 831/626-9555 BBNMonterey@sbcglobal.net
Daniel Nelson 518/786-5065 nelson@siena.edu
Darcey Ortolf 212/749-0980 dortolf@noln.com
Vincent Pastore 704/662-3433 vpastore@adelphia.net
Patricia Patrick 808/883-0009 pcpmd@hotmail.com
Yvonne Pennington 404/255-6967 -
Audrey Punnett 559/225-6891 afpunnett@cs.com
Trudy Rankin 863/682-2810 trudycorryrankin@verizon.net
Janet Robinson 650/325-9796 jspenrob@earthlink.com
Connie Rodriguez 530/269-2812 connie@soulmatters.com
Virginia Rose 530/265-4519 vrose@nccn.net
Luana Rowland 808/957-0038 luanarowland@aol.com
Alexander Shaia 505/986-8100 ashaia@earthlink.net
Carla Sharp 808/261-0066 carlasharp@hawaii.rr.com
Sherry Shepherd 81-774-25-2505 renmu@po.kbu.ac.jp
Karen Signell - karensignell@comcast.net
Melaney Sreenan 970/325-0777 coach@melaney.com
Pam Starr 650/234-9698 sirus210@comcast.net
Sally Sugatt 603/778-3180 ssugatt@comcast.net
Sachiko Taki Reece 323/661-5297 sachikoreece@earthlink.net
Janet Tatum 425/487-0536 -
Barbara Turner 707/894-8980 bturn@sonic.net
Barbara Waterman 510/763-1800 pachabarbara@earthlink.net
Barbara Weller 218/525/2059 bwell5170@msn.com
Roz Winter 973/509-7861 riwinter@aol.com
Judy Zappacosta 831/479-7106 zappaj@sbcglobal.net
Sheila Zarrow 818/591-7418 sheilazarrow@mac.com

Advisor – Additional Information

Requirements and Role of the Advisor:
  1. Must be a clinical member for at least two years.
  2. Can be a teaching member.
  3. Must be a member in good standing.
  4. Is the primary liaison between the applicant and STA
  5. Maintain a confidential file of all correspondence and notes of telephone
    calls, etc., during the advisory process, and, in case of non-acceptance, for
    five years afterwards.
  6. Reads and checks the application.
  7. Is the primary contact for feedback and guidance on the choice of topic and
    formal of the preliminary papers.
  8. Assists the applicant to select preliminary and final case readers.
  9. If requested, writes a letter to STA if the applicant submits an appeal.

Advisor’s Role in the Final Case Report Process:

  • Helps the candidate understand and follow instructions for preparing and
    submitting the case report.
  • Offers help in selecting approved readers of case reports.
  • Helps readers and candidate agree in advance regarding the amount of time
    needed for reading and evaluation; normally the case should be evaluated and
    returned to the candidate within a two-month period.
  • Reminds the candidate to send a copy of the signed reader agreement forms or
    letters from each of the readers who have agreed to read the case reports to
    you, the advisor, for the confidential file and to the STA office.
  • Reminds the candidate that the cover letter to readers should include the
    following information:
    • That approval or non-approval of case should be sent directly to the
      advisor, not to the candidate, and
    • That after the case has been sent to the readers, all communications to
      the readers should go through the advisor, not the candidate.
  • Facilitates time frame difficulties. If, during the process, it appears that a
    reader cannot evaluate the case within a two-month time frame, the advisor
    should explore the difficulty with the reader. In some cases, the advisor may
    need to consult with the candidate about the problem, and perhaps advise the
    candidate to select a different reader.
  • Communicates with readers. The advisor, not the candidate, communicates
    with readers once readers have received the case.
  • All readers’ evaluations must be received before the advisor informs the candidate of
    the results. Normally the advisor does not identify the source of specific comments. A
    reader may choose to send his/her individual comments to the candidate after the
    evaluation process has been completed.

Depending on the outcome of the evaluations, the advisor follows one or more of these
procedures:

  1. If the advisor received evaluations from the two STA readers that do not agree
    or two readers check “Conditional Acceptance”, the advisor informs the two
    readers so that they can talk by telephone or in person about their evaluations.
  2. If the advisor receives “Accept” evaluations from all three readers, the advisor:
    1. Informs the candidate of his/her acceptance as a clinical member
    2. Notifies the STA office in writing, using Form 10, of the acceptance of the
      candidate for clinical membership; the STA office notifies the STA Board
      of Trustees and the secretary of ISST
    3. Alerts the applicant that he/she will receive certifying letters from STA
      and ISST.
    4. Reminds the candidate that once these letters are received, he/she needs
      to send membership dues, a copy of his/her malpractice insurance cover
      sheet along with a signed malpractice insurance agreement, a signed
      Code of Ethics agreement, as well as how the candidate wants
      him/herself listed on the membership roster.
  3. If the advisor received two “Accept” evaluations with a single “Conditional
    Acceptance” evaluation, a conference of the three readers, usually by telephone,
    is required to work toward a consensus. If none is reached, the majority rules.
    1. If the consensus or majority is an acceptance, advisor follows the
      procedure in #2 above.
    2. If the consensus or majority is a rejection, follow #4 below.
    3. If the consensus or majority is conditional, follow #5 below.
  4. If the advisor receives three “Reject” evaluations, or two “Reject” and one
    “Conditional Acceptance” evaluations, the advisor requests that the three
    readers confer and author one letter signed by all three readers with their
    impressions of the case and rationale about why this case report was not
    accepted.
    1. The advisor informs the candidate that the case was not accepted, and
      gives the letter from the three readers to the candidate.
    2. Not accepting the case implies that is cannot be accepted at this time,
      even in a revised form, and that, for the next application, either the case
      itself, e.g., the client’s sandplay process had not been completed, or the
      case report needs to be altered in a major way or a new case study needs
      to be written.
    3. The advisor informs the STA office of the final results.
    4. The candidate must wait at least one year before submitting a revised or
      new case report. The year begins from the date of the letter that cites the
      rationale for not accepting the case report.
    5. A total of two re-submissions can occur. The paper must be resubmitted
      to the same readers.
  5. If the advisor received any other combination of evaluations, e.g., evaluations
    other than the ones mentioned above:
    1. The advisor requests that the readers send a synopsis of their concerns
      and questions to the advisor who will send copies of these to the other
      readers.
    2. The three readers then confer and author one letter signed by all three
      readers with the agreed upon concerns, questions, and changes they
      wish the candidate to address.
    3. The advisor then presents this letter to the candidate, who responds to
      the requests by re-submitting his/her case with agreed upon changes.
    4. After reading the re-submitted paper, the readers notify the advisor of
      their evaluations of the changes.
    5. If a consensus is not reached, then the majority rules – see above.
      In all instances, the advisor informs all the readers of the final results regarding the
      candidate’s case report and requests that they return the case report to the candidate
      with comments and suggestions.

Current List of Eligible Members to Serve as Advisors:

First Name Last Name Phone Email
Frank Adair 650/368-2573 fadair@pacbell.net
Kate Adams 215/348-8454 keadams@comcast.net
Kate Amatruda 415/899-0013 info@psychceu.com
Barbara Bagan 480/367-1476 rxart1@aol.com
Linda   Bath 530/681-8401 le_bath@yahoo.com
Agnes  Bayley 401/635-2012 -
Kathleen    Beavers 916/984-8769 kabeavers@earthlink.net
Lee Ben-Yehuda 619/501-8843 LeesMail@aol.com
Wendy Beneke 337/988-0184 wbeneke@aol.com
LaVon Bobo 408/549-5308 -
Kay Bradway 415/332-3367 katherinebradway1@msn.com
Priscilla Braun 952/870-4264 cilbraun@aol.com
Nancy Burnett 303/753-1002 nancyburnettphd@qwest.net
Joyce Camuyrano Cunningham 415/668-8250 JoyceCunninghamJournalofSandplayTherapy@att.net
Tessamarie    Capitolo 415/456-4448 tssamarie@aol.com
Lucia  Chambers 408/244-7942x3# luciaac@aol.com
Maria Ellen    Chiaia 510/654-3281 mchiaia@aol.com
Lauren Cunningham 415/585-4551 lauren_c@pacbell.net
Linda Dean 707/443-4105 lindadean1@cox.net
Lucretia Devine 206/818-8445 lucretiamd@att.net
Regina Driscoll 651/220-6900 Regina.driscoll@childrensmn.org
Patricia Dunn Fierstein 813/253-3797 patricia.df@verizon.net
Pratibha Eastwood 808/595-HOPE pratibhaeastwood@iname.com
Christine Ford 303/832-9767 sandford@ecentral.com
Grace Foster Pollard 303/554-8838 gafpollard@aol.com
Harriet Friedman 310/277-9503 shrinks2@sbcglobal.net
Susan Gillotti 508/696-6072 gillotti.mvy@verizon.net
Lois Gradwell 925/943-1274 legradwell@aol.com
Mariellen Griffith 309/454-2111 mariellengriffith@verizon.net
Florence Grossenbacher 510/891-8125 -
Olivia Heathcote 408/920-2990 droliviadh@aol.com
Gretchen Hegeman 206/781-7736 gretchenhegeman@hotmail.com
Rosalind Heiko 919/517-2697 sandplayer@mindspring.com
Grace Hong +886 2 2367-9595
#629
hong2298@ms43.hinet.net
Linda Hunter 561/582-9284 Ray4s@aol.com
Diane Hyde 503/227-6080 dianehyde@qwest.net
Betty Jackson 717/529-2768 bettyjlcsw@aol.com
Donna Johnson 404/812-0628 dj4art@earthlink.net
Holly Johnson - HEHJNYC@aol.com
Jacquelyn Kelley 469/667-9413 Jkelley200@aol.com
Liana Kornfield 415/488-9780 lkornfield@aol.com
Susan Macnofsky 505/867-1430 suesky@aol.com
Elizabeth Margoliash 707/542-4549 -
Zoe McClellan 707/664-9611 -
Bonnie McLean 503/221-7220 bmcl10000@qwest.net
Lynne McManus 925/933-4072 lynne3542@ca.astound.net
Joseph Meyer 715/268-4743 joemeyer@amerytel.net
Flavia Millikan 707/939-3877 flaviamillikan@earthlink.net
Betty Milstead 512/345-0249 bmilstead@austin.rr.com
Randa Miranda Diamond 510/843-7106 andarmi@earthlink.net
Barbara Miriello 619/584-1725 -
Rie Rogers Mitchell 818/677-4976 rie.mitchell@csun.edu
Gita Morena 619/328-9020 gitam@aol.com
Barbara B. Nelson 831/626-9555 BBNMonterey@sbcglobal.net
Daniel Nelson 518/786-5065 nelson@siena.edu
Darcey Ortolf 212/749-0980 dortolf@noln.com
Vincent Pastore 704/662-3433 vpastore@adelphia.net
Patricia Patrick 808/883-0009 pcpmd@hotmail.com
Yvonne Pennington 404/255-6967 -
Audrey Punnett 559/225-6891 afpunnett@cs.com
Trudy Rankin 863/682-2810 trudycorryrankin@verizon.net
Janet Robinson 650/325-9796 jspenrob@earthlink.com
Virginia Rose 530/265-4519 vrose@nccn.net
Luana Rowland 808/957-0038 luanarowland@aol.com
Alexander Shaia 505/986-8100 ashaia@earthlink.net
Carla Sharp 808/261-0066 carlasharp@hawaii.rr.com
Sherry Shepherd 81-774-25-2505 renmu@po.kbu.ac.jp
Karen Signell - karensignell@comcast.net
Pam Starr 650/234-9698 sirus210@comcast.net
Sally Sugatt 603/778-3180 ssugatt@comcast.net
Sachiko Taki Reece 323/661-5297 sachikoreece@earthlink.net
Janet Tatum 425/487-0536 -
Barbara Turner 707/894-8980 bturn@sonic.net
Barbara Waterman 510/763-1800 pachabarbara@earthlink.net
Barbara Weller 218/525/2059 bwell5170@msn.com
Roz Winter 973/509-7861 riwinter@aol.com
Judy Zappacosta 831/479-7106 zappaj@sbcglobal.net
Sheila Zarrow 818/591-7418 sheilazarrow@mac.com

ADVISORY INTERVIEW GUIDELINES PURPOSE
The purpose of the advisory interview is to provide helpful, constructive feedback to
applicants in order to assist them in acquiring thorough, well-rounded, integrated
training in sandplay, which will lead to successful completion of requirements for
membership in STA/ISST.

PROCEDURE
The steps in the advisory interview process are as follows:

  1. The applicant’s application materials are sent to the committee members for
    review prior to the interview.
  2. The interview committee convenes at the scheduled time, or a few minutes
    before if possible. The chairperson assumes the role of greeting the applicant
    and explaining the procedure.
  3. The interview proceeds with the chairperson taking the lead in facilitating
    questions and discussion. Make sure there is an opportunity for the applicant
    to ask any questions he or she may have. This segment usually lasts 30-45
    minutes.
  4. The chairperson asks the applicant to wait outside for 10-15 minutes while the
    committee discusses impressions and formulates recommendations.
  5. The applicant is invited back in for the sharing of feedback and
    recommendations. Make sure the applicant’s strengths are noted in addition to
    areas, which the committee feels need further development. Allow 10-15
    minutes for this segment.
  6. After the applicant leaves, the committee composes a letter summarizing the
    committee’s impressions. This letter should include a statement of thanks for
    the time and energy taken to attend the interview, comments on the applicant’s
    strengths, comments on aspects of training needing further development, and
    recommendations for addressing those. The chairperson assumes
    responsibility for making sure a copy of this letter is sent to the applicant his or
    her advisor, and the chairs of the Advisory/Membership Committee.
  7. The chairperson collects all copies of the applicant’s application and returns
    them to the applicant. (The Membership chair and STA office will already have
    a copy on file.)

CRITERIA
The following criteria may be looked for in assessing an applicant undergoing an
advisory interview:

  1. Indication that the applicant’s connection to sandplay is a deep and personal
    one, conveying the sense that they would have pursued the experience and
    study of sandplay in spite of membership requirements, that it has not been
    merely an academic exercise.
  2. Indication that the applicant is committed to ongoing personal growth and
    conveys an honest attitude of being in process, on a path so to speak.
  3. Indication that the applicant understands the theory and process of sandplay
    and is able to articulate it in a clear, cohesive way. This should include a clear
    grasp of concepts of Jungian psychology and the ability to apply Jungian theory
    to sandplay process. It should also include an ability to discriminate between
    Kalffian sandplay